News
Think about how you bought wine five years ago. There was probably a house red, picked up weekly without much thought, and the occasional nicer bottle for something special.
Now the weekly bottle has quietly disappeared, and the ones you do buy cost noticeably more.
You are not imagining it, and you are not alone. "Drink less but better" has become the shorthand for the biggest shift in wine buying this decade. The data behind it is real, and slightly stranger than the phrase suggests.
What does "drink less but better" actually mean?
Two things are happening at once, pulling in opposite directions.
Volume is falling, and not gently. US wine consumption has dropped by nearly 20% since its pandemic-era peak in 2021, according to Wine Institute figures, and global consumption has fallen to a 60-year low on the OIV's numbers.
Spending, meanwhile, hit a record. The 2026 BMO Wine Market Report put total US consumer spending on wine above $115 billion in 2025 — more than ever before — with market value up 3% even as total volume declined for another consecutive year.
Fewer bottles, more money. That is the whole trend in four words, and the interesting question is why.
Are people really trading up, or just paying more?
Both, and the distinction matters more than the headline does.
The trading-up part is genuine. Sommeliers report it consistently: people buying one bottle instead of three, and choosing something with a story behind it. "People are drinking less, but when they do buy a bottle, they are much more willing to pay for something quality," Ryan Sipin of La Fête told SevenFifty Daily. Restaurants are adapting by pouring more premium wines by the glass so a single glass can be the treat.
But a large slice of that record spend is simply cost. A 15% tariff is pushing up prices on European wine, which supplies around 80% of US imports, and trade figures showed imported wine prices at US retailers rising 5% even after Italian and French producers cut their own export prices. Some in the trade expect retail prices to climb 15 to 20% over a couple of years. In a Wine Opinions survey, 47% of people who said they were drinking less gave rising prices as the reason.
BMO's own assessment is blunt: higher prices are keeping market value elevated while "masking a structural slide in consumption". And premiumisation itself is cooling — Silicon Valley Bank's industry forecasting has premium wine sales growth sliding towards zero by 2027, with premium-plus volumes already down 2% in 2025.
So the tidy story of a nation deliberately upgrading its cellar is only half true. The other half is that wine got more expensive whether or not you chose to spend more.
Why does that make each bottle matter more?
Because the arithmetic of a mistake has changed.
When wine was a weekly $10 habit, a disappointing bottle cost you $10 and a shrug. Next week's bottle was a fresh attempt. When wine becomes a fortnightly $30 decision, a bottle you do not enjoy costs more and there are fewer chances to correct it. The stakes per choice have roughly doubled while the number of choices has halved.
Which is exactly when the usual way of choosing starts to look strange. A score of 4,5 points tells you that a large crowd of strangers found an average. It tells you nothing about whether you will like it. If you prefer soft, fruit-forward reds, a brilliantly rated tannic Barolo is an expensive way to find that out.
More money per bottle without better information is just costlier guessing.
Where is the money actually going in 2026?
If you want to spend well, it helps to know what the trade is watching.
Classic European regions are back. Bordeaux, Rioja, Piedmont, Chianti and Champagne are all being named by buyers as returning favourites, helped by strong recent vintages and prices that look reasonable against their reputations. Rioja is a particularly good route into aged wine, since producers traditionally hold bottles back and release them late. If those names feel intimidating, the difference between Old World and New World styles is the most useful thing to understand first, and the distinctions between Champagne, Prosecco and Cava will stop you overpaying for the wrong bubbles.
Fresh, aromatic whites keep winning. Sancerre has become so popular it has priced itself off many wine lists, which has opened room for the same crisp, mineral profile from elsewhere. Sauvignon Blanc from Italy and Austria, and grapes like Albariño, Assyrtiko and Vermentino. Sauvignon Blanc in the $15–20 bracket has grown more than 4% over six years while wine overall shrank.
The middle is being squeezed from both ends. Growth expectations cluster at the $20–29 tier and above $100, with less enthusiasm in between. Supermarket own-label and retailer-exclusive wines are also expanding fast, which is where a lot of genuine value now sits.
How do you spend more without guessing more?
Four habits make a bigger difference than any score.
Know your structure, not just your grapes. "I like Malbec" is a weak brief. "I like soft tannins, low acidity and ripe dark fruit" travels across every region and price point, and it is what actually predicts whether you will enjoy a bottle. Learning the core wine characteristics is the single highest-return hour you can spend on this.
Trade up within a style you already like, not into a new one. A better example of something you know you enjoy is a reliable upgrade. A famous bottle in a style you have never warmed to is a gamble with more money on it.
Use the substitution trick. When a region gets fashionable, its neighbours sell the same profile for less. Sancerre to Vermentino, Champagne to a good Cava, Barolo to a Langhe Nebbiolo. Knowing the common grapes and what they taste like makes these swaps obvious.
Keep track of what you tried. If you are only buying twenty bottles a year, remembering which ones worked is no longer optional. Keeping a record of the wines you have tried turns twenty purchases into twenty data points instead of twenty forgotten evenings.
What "better" doesn't mean
A few honest caveats, because the trend invites some sloppy thinking.
More expensive is not automatically better for you:
Price correlates with scarcity, reputation and production cost. It does not correlate with your palate. Plenty of people have spent $70 confirming they do not enjoy old Burgundy.
A high score is not a recommendation:
It is an average of other people, and averages have no idea who you are.
Fewer bottles only beats more bottles if you enjoy them:
The point of buying less is that what you do buy is worth it. Otherwise it is just a smaller amount of disappointment.
Ready to make each bottle count?
If you are buying fewer, more considered bottles, the return on knowing your own palate has never been higher. That is precisely what Swirl does: instead of handing you an average of strangers' opinions, it learns what you like and recommends against that.
Scan any wine label and get details sourced from the producer, not the crowd
Build a private taste profile that sharpens with every wine you rate
Get personalised recommendations instead of an average score
Keep your tasting notes and favourites so good bottles are never lost
Free on iOS and Android
Download Swirl free and build your taste profile
Sources
Higher Wine Spending Masks Ongoing Industry Challenges: 2026 BMO Wine Market Report — BMO
Americans Are Drinking Less Wine, but Spending More Than Ever Before — Robb Report
IWSR says inflation undercut the alcohol industry's premiumization gains — Vinetur
'The Worst Is Behind Us': Silicon Valley Bank's 2026 Wine Industry Report — SevenFifty Daily
Head Sommelier
Marcus is our Head Sommelier with experience in highly regarded places including 1, 2 and 3-Michelin-starred restaurants. With over 10 years of experience, he's passionate about helping people having unforgettable wine experiences.
Go to all articles
